Skip to main content

analysis of the crash of Angara Airlines Flight 2G‑2311 (RA‑47315)

Here’s a detailed news report and analysis of the crash of Angara Airlines Flight 2G‑2311 (RA‑47315) on 24 July 2025 near Tynda Airport, Amur Oblast, Russia

Incident Overview

On Thursday, 24 July 2025, Angara Airlines Flight 2G‑2311, an Antonov An‑24RV (registration RA‑47315, built in 1976), crashed at approximately 12:58 local time, while on final approach to Tynda Airport. All 48 occupants (42 passengers, including five children, and six crew) were killed.

The aircraft disappeared from radar during its second landing attempt, after a failed first approach; no distress call was issued.

The wreckage was located burning on a mountainous forest slope about 15–16 km (9–10 miles) from the runway; rescue crews had to cut through dense forest and marshland to reach the site.

Key Contributing Factors

Ageing Aircraft & Maintenance Pressures

The aircraft was nearly 50 years old, built in 1976. Angara had extended its service life through 2036, far beyond typical international retirements by modern standards.

The An‑24 fleet had a history of multiple non-fatal technical incidents since 2018—including generator failure (2022), radio malfunction (2023), and approach warning alert (2022).

Western sanctions have made spare parts and maintenance support scarce, forcing airlines to rely on aging airframes and local improvisation.

Pilot Actions & Visibility Conditions

The crash occurred during a second approach in poor visibility, conditions likely worsened by remote terrain and weather.

Preliminary state media reports cite possible crew error during approach procedures—such as descending below decision altitude or misjudging glide path.

Similar prior investigations (e.g. 2010 Katekavia An‑24 crash) identified pilot descent below minima in low visibility, without initiating a go‑around, as a direct cause.

Regulatory & Systemic Pressures

A criminal investigation has been launched, citing possible violations of air traffic rules and negligence causing multiple deaths.

Russia has struggled to modernize its regional fleet due to sanctions restricting imports of Western aircraft (e.g. Airbus, ATR), leading to reliance on Soviet-era An‑24s

Preliminary Analysis

Bringing together the available evidence:

The aircraft’s significant age combined with its incident history raises legitimate concerns about mechanical reliability.

The weather conditions and remote terrain likely complicated the landing, and preliminary reports indicate the crew might have continued a risky descent under low visibility instead of initiating a go‑around.

While the An‑24 is a rugged aircraft accustomed to Siberian conditions, operational limitations under sanctions—including parts shortages and constrained training—have stressed safety margins.

Investigations remain ongoing, and final determination from MAK (the Interstate Aviation Committee) will clarify whether mechanical failure, human error, or regulatory lapses were primary triggers.

Final Thoughts

This tragedy again highlights the perils of operating outdated aircraft in remote regions without robust maintenance and oversight. The broader implications may extend to other carriers still flying similar fleets in Russia and beyond. As the official investigation progresses, authorities are likely to examine procedural safeguards, training adequacy, and maintenance integrity under challenging economic constraints.

Resources

Gallery



Social Media

Confidence Rating

The information provided is based on news reports and social media sources, which may not always be fully verified. This analysis is a self-effort and does not reflect official statements or conclusions. As such, the confidence rating for this data is considered unofficial and subject to further investigation.

Keep Updated

Stay connected for real-time updates and exclusive content. Follow us on X.com and LinkedIn to get the latest accident news and industry insights. Join the conversation and stay informed with AirSpaceNews.com

#RussiaPlaneCrash #AntonovAn24 #AngaraAirlines #TyndaCrash #AviationAccident #AirSafety #AircraftCrash #Flight2G2311 #PlaneCrash2025 #AviationNews #MAKInvestigation #PilotError #AgingAircraft

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Three Killed in Mooney M20J Crash Near Nampa Municipal Airport

Nampa, Idaho – July 27, 2025 — A Mooney M20J single-engine aircraft crashed into a residential area just west of Nampa Municipal Airport shortly after takeoff Sunday evening, killing all three people onboard. The flight lasted less than one minute. The aircraft, tail number N5764H , was registered to Sleeptytime PLLC , a private operator based in Eagle, Idaho. It departed from Runway 29 at approximately 5:41 p.m. local time and reached an altitude of roughly 200 feet above ground level before executing a sharp 180-degree turn. Moments later, the plane lost control and crashed into an unoccupied structure near North Venice Street. Emergency responders were dispatched within minutes of the crash, which was reported by multiple eyewitnesses who saw the aircraft descending rapidly and emitting smoke. The impact destroyed the aircraft and set off a brief fire. No one on the ground was hurt. Local authorities, including Nampa Mayor Debbie Kling, expressed condolences to the victims’ familie...

Cirrus SR22T Crash Near Macon County Airport Claims Three Lives

Franklin, NC – September 18, 2025 – A Cirrus SR22T GTS G5 Carbon (N218VB) crashed during an attempted landing at Macon County Airport (1A5) in Franklin, North Carolina, resulting in the deaths of all three occupants. The aircraft had departed from Nashville-John C. Tune Airport (KJWN) earlier that day. ADS-B tracking shows the aircraft attempted a go-around on Runway 7, followed by a second approach. During the sequence, the airplane impacted terrain approximately 500 feet north of the runway and came to rest upright in an open field. Authorities reported that the wreckage remained intact with no debris field leading to the main site, and no post-crash fire occurred. Local emergency services responded promptly, and the NTSB has taken charge of the investigation. Weather reports from the time of the accident indicated calm winds, clear visibility, and scattered clouds at 4,500 ft , suggesting no immediate weather hazards. This tragedy comes as a shock to the community, as the cra...

Aviation Safety Analysis: Accidents, Fatalities, Nature and Causes (2019 - 2024)

This report presents an in-depth analysis of aviation accidents and fatalities over the past year (2019 - 2024), based on data driven from the Aviation Safety Network’s global accident database. It provides a comprehensive breakdown of incidents by flight nature, phase of flight, accident location, and primary causes. The objective is to identify key trends and contributing factors, offering valuable insights into aviation safety and risk mitigation. The analysis is structured around five key breakdowns: Aircraft Type – Categorizing accidents by aircraft model (Jet, Piston, Turboprop). Fatal vs. Non-Fatal – Differentiating incidents based on severity and casualty levels. Land vs. Water Accidents – Identifying accident locations and environmental factors. Airliner vs. Corporate Jet – Comparing accident data across commercial and private aviation sectors. Incident Breakdown: Events & Fatalities – Total number of accidents ( 907 ) and associated fatalities ( 1304 ). Ground Fatali...